The DifferentialEquations.jl ecosystem has an extensive set of state-of-the-art methods for solving differential equations. By mixing native methods and wrapped methods under the same dispatch system, DifferentialEquations.jl serves both as a system to deploy and research the most modern efficient methodologies. While most of the basic methods have been developed and optimized, many newer methods need high performance implementations and real-world tests of their efficiency claims. In this project students will be paired with current researchers in the discipline to get a handle on some of the latest techniques and build efficient implementations into the *DiffEq libraries (OrdinaryDiffEq.jl, StochasticDiffEq.jl, DelayDiffEq.jl). Possible families of methods to implement are:

- Implicit-Explicit (IMEX) Methods
- Geometric (exponential) integrators
- Low memory Runge-Kutta methods
- Multistep methods specialized for second order ODEs (satellite simulation)
- Parallel (multithreaded) extrapolation (both explicit and implicit)
- Parallel Implicit Integrating Factor Methods (PDEs and SPDEs)
- Parallel-in-time ODE Methods
- Rosenbrock-W methods
- Approximate matrix factorization
- Runge-Kutta-Chebyschev Methods (high stability RK methods)
- Fully Implicit Runge-Kutta (FIRK) methods
- Anderson Acceleration
- Boundary value problem (BVP) solvers like MIRK and collocation methods
- BDF methods for differential-algebraic equations (DAEs)
- Methods for stiff stochastic differential equations

Many of these methods are the basis of high-efficiency partial differential equation (PDE) solvers and are thus important to many communities like computational fluid dynamics, mathematical biology, and quantum mechanics.

**Recommended Skills**: Background knowledge in numerical analysis, numerical
linear algebra, and the ability (or eagerness to learn) to write fast code.

**Expected Results**: Contributions of production-quality solver methods.

**Mentors**: Chris Rackauckas

Neural networks can be used as a method for efficiently solving difficult partial differential equations. Efficient implementations from recent papers are being explored as part of the NeuralNetDiffEq.jl package. The issue tracker contains links to papers which would be interesting new neural network based methods to implement and benchmark against classical techniques.

**Recommended Skills**: Background knowledge in numerical analysis and machine learning.

**Expected Results**: New neural network based solver methods.

**Mentors**: Chris Rackauckas

Wouldn’t it be cool to have had a part in the development of widely used efficient differential equation solvers? DifferentialEquations.jl has a wide range of existing methods and an extensive benchmark suite which is used for tuning the methods for performance. Many of its methods are already the fastest in their class, but there is still a lot of performance enhancement work that can be done. In this project you can learn the details about a wide range of methods and dig into the optimization of the algorithm’s strategy and the implementation in order to improve benhcmarks. Projects that could potentially improve the performance of the full differential equations ecosystem include:

- Alternative adaptive stepsize techniques and step optimization
- Pointer swapping tricks
- Quasi-Newton globalization and optimization
- Cache size reductions
- Enhanced within-method multithreading, distributed parallelism, and GPU usage
- Improved automated method choosing
- Adaptive preconditioning on large-scale (PDE) discretizations

**Recommended Skills**: Background knowledge in numerical analysis, numerical
linear algebra, and the ability (or eagerness to learn) to write fast code.

**Expected Results**: Improved benchmarks to share with the community.

**Mentors**: Chris Rackauckas

There are two ways to approach libraires for partial differential equations (PDEs): one can build “toolkits” which enable users to discretize any PDE but require knowledge of numerical PDE methods, or one can build “full-stop” PDE solvers for specific PDEs. There are many different ways solving PDEs could be approached, and here are some ideas for potential projects:

- Automated PDE discretization tooling. We want users to describe a PDE in its mathematical form and automate the rest of the solution process. See this issue for details.
- Enhancement of existing tools for discretizing PDEs. The finite differencing (FDM) library DiffEqOperators.jl could be enahnced to allow non-uniform grids or composition of operators. The finite element method (FEM) library FEniCS.jl could wrap more of the FEniCS library.
- Full stop solvers of common fluid dynamical equations, such as diffusion-advection- convection equations, or of hyperbolic PDEs such as the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations would be useful to many users.
- Using stochastic differential equation (SDE) solvers to efficiently (and highly parallel) approximate certain PDEs.
- Development of ODE solvers for more efficiently solving specific types of PDE discretizations. See the “Native Julia solvers for ordinary differential equations” project.

**Recommended Skills**: Background knowledge in numerical methods for solving
differential equations. Some basic knowledge of PDEs, but mostly a willingness
to learn and a strong understanding of calculus and linear algebra.

**Expected Results**: A production-quality PDE solver package for some common PDEs.

**Mentors**: Chris Rackauckas

Global Sensitivity Analysis is a popular tool to assess the affect that parameters have on a differential equation model. A good introduction can be found in this thesis. Global Sensitivity Analysis tools can be much more efficient than Local Sensitivity Analysis tools, and give a better view of how parameters affect the model in a more general sense. The goal of this project would be to implement more global sensitivity analysis methods like the eFAST method into DiffEqSensitivity.jl which can be used with any differential equation solver on the common interface.

**Recommended Skills**: An understanding of how to use DifferentialEquations.jl
to solve equations.

**Expected Results**: Efficient functions for performing global sensitivity
analysis.

**Mentors**: Chris Rackauckas

Parameter identifiability analysis is an analysis that describes whether the parameters of a dynamical system can be identified from data or whether they are redundent. There are two forms of identifiability analysis: structural and practical. Structural identifiability analysis relates changes in the solution of the ODE directly to other parameters, showcasing that it is impossible to distinguish between parameter A being higher and parameter B being lower, or the vice versa situation, given only data about the solution because of how the two interact. This could be done directly on the symbolic form of the equation as part of ModelingToolkit.jl. Meanwhile, practical identifiability analysis looks as to whether the parameters are non-identifiable in a practical sense, for example if two parameters are numerically indistinguishable (given possibly noisy data). In this case, numerical techniques being built in DiffEqSensitivity.jl, such as a nonlinear likelihood profiler or an information sensitivity measure can be used to showcase whether a parameter has a unique enough effect to be determined.

**Recommended Skills**: A basic background in differential equations and the ability to use
numerical ODE solver libraries. Background in the numerical analysis of differential equation
solvers is not required.

**Expected Results**: Efficient and high-quality implementations of parameter identifiability
methods.

**Mentors**: Chris Rackauckas

Model order reduction is a technique for automatically finding a small model which approximates the large model but is computationally much cheaper. We plan to use the infrustructure built by ModelingToolkit.jl to implement a litany of methods and find out the best way to accelerate differential equation solves.

**Recommended Skills**: A basic background in differential equations and the ability to use
numerical ODE solver libraries. Background in the numerical analysis of differential equation
solvers is not required.

**Expected Results**: Efficient and high-quality implementations of model order reduction methods.

**Mentors**: Chris Rackauckas

Numerically solving a differential equation can be difficult, and thus it can be helpful for users to simplify their model before handing it to the solver. Alas this takes time… so let’s automate it! ModelingToolkit.jl is a project for automating the model transformation process. Various parts of the library are still open, such as:

- Support for DAEs, DDEs, and SDEs
- Pantelides algorithm for DAE index reduction
- Lamperti transforms
- Automatic construction of adjoint solutions
- Tearing in nonlinear solvers
- Solving distributed delay equations

**Recommended Skills**: A basic background in differential equations and the ability to use
numerical ODE solver libraries. Background in the numerical analysis of differential equation
solvers is not required.

**Expected Results**: Efficient and high-quality implementations of model transformation methods.

**Mentors**: Chris Rackauckas